EvilReads is Andrew Shaffer's blog of publishing humor, news, and opinion.

Shaffer is the author of Great Philosophers Who Failed at Love (Harper Perennial, 2011) and a contributor to The Hunger Games and Philosophy (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012). His writing has appeared in Mental Floss, Maxim, and RT Book Reviews, the romance novel industry's leading publication.

join andrew's semi-quarterly mailing list
 

Evil Theme Song

Download the MP3 for free! Right-click on the link below and choose "Save Link As..." to save it to your desktop.

"Evil Wylie Theme Song" by Amanda Palmer

Advertisements

Members Only
« Hail to the King! | Main | Meet My Dark Master, Emperor Franzen »
Wednesday
Sep012010

Scribd.com Comes to the Dark Side

I thought I had figured out every conceivable way to squeeze money out of authors...until I saw this post yesterday from Paperback Writer:

[As of July 27th] Scribd.com has begun charging people to download my free e-books hosted on their site. They are using an archive subscription scam to make their money (this also neatly avoids them having to pay me any royalties on the profits they make.)

Evidently all the money they've been raking in from the Google ads they've posted on my e-book pages hasn't been enough for them.... I was not made aware of this new policy by Scribd at all; a reader kindly brought it to my attention. If you have free stories or documents hosted on this site, chances are they're doing the same to you.

Yikes! And you thought that Evil Wylie was evil! Charging readers to access free e-books and other documents WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE AUTHORS?! I wish I had thought of this scam legitimate business venture first.

Their "archive" scheme process works like this: after an unspecified "period of time," all free, publicly-viewable documents posted to Scribd.com are retired to an archive. To download those documents, readers who visit Scribd.com must cough up either $5 for a 24-hour downloading period or $9 for a monthly subscription. Simply viewing archived documents does not require payment.

Scribd.com offers an option to return the document to the free "current" section AFTER it has been archived. In an absolutely brilliant move, however, their terms of service don't actually state when documents will be archived...so authors have no easy way to determine when their work will be archived (and thus available for un-archiving).

According to Scribd.com, "The Scribd Archive is.... an acknowledgement of the importance of the combined scholarship and imagination of so many people [i.e. the authors who have used our service]." Thank you for acknowledging the importance of the writers who created the work that you are now pimping like street meat distributing.

Final thoughts, straight from the Scribd.com general terms of use: "You hereby grant Scribd a worldwide license.... to exploit Your User Content."

UPDATE: Scribd responds! <--Read my new post from 9/2/10

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (15)

To exploit, make money, and we'll make you jump through hoops to get it down AND while you're jumping thru hoops......

O.o

September 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM | Unregistered CommenterShiloh Walker

I love the distributed idea of pushing my content anywhere and everywhere that wants it. But, this is an unfortunately good example of how you have to be careful with whom you entrust your content.

Though I still endorse a liberal attitude of sharing content, as many places as possible, I'm definitely removing Scribd from that list.

September 1, 2010 at 6:58 PM | Unregistered CommenterJason N

UPDATE! Evil Wylie contacted Scribd and successfully negotiated a resolution. Scribd now offers the option for an author to PERMANENTLY OPT ALL DOCUMENTS OUT of the "archives." This is effective immediately. This doesn't mean that what they did was right (although their terms and conditions allow them to basically do whatever), but they do respond to complaints rather swiftly.

September 1, 2010 at 10:58 PM | Registered CommenterAndrew Shaffer

Thanks for letting authors know about opting out of the Scribd archives. I've had nothing but incredible experiences on Scribd, so it's been disheartening to read the disgruntled words of other users.

September 2, 2010 at 1:19 AM | Unregistered CommenterHyla Molander

Offering opt-out is insanely lame. They already have a business built primarily on stolen content that the authors haven't noticed was stolen yet, and now you have to opt out of them charging people money to view your content. Fuck Scribd.

Scribd is run by immoral assholes, and every time I think they can't get worse, they prove me wrong.

Fuck them. Here's to hoping somebody with some money decides to fuck off with the DMCA complaints and just sues the living shit out of the worthless, unethical, value-stealing founders of that awful, awful website.

Posting anonymously because those WORTHLESS SACKS OF SHIT host pirated versions of my content, force me to go and find it, are lousy at noting dupe re-uploads, and have engineered their entire system to remain within the letter of the law whilst profiting from piracy. Fuck them. Fuck them in their tiny, worthless, talent-free assholes.

[So you're saying you're not a fan? ;) -- Evil Wylie]

September 2, 2010 at 3:19 AM | Unregistered CommenterFS

Hyla: what "incredible" experiences did you have? To be frank, I don't believe you.

I have trouble believing that Scribd has done anything good for anybody, given that they host fucktons of obviously pirated content and clearly don't care.

Which Scribd employee are you, Hyla? Because no intelligent human being could possibly look at Scribd and see a thing of value. It's just a place run by criminals.

September 2, 2010 at 3:20 AM | Unregistered CommenterFS

I think you might need to publish their responce/your new blog entry, I can't view it.

[Their response is located here now on the HuffPost--the address of the URL may have changed. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tammy-h-nam/shedding-light-on-scribd-_1_b_702788.html -- Evil Wylie]

September 2, 2010 at 6:09 AM | Unregistered CommenterSam Granger

I just signed up for Scribd before reading this. Damn.

[See the updated post on Scribd's response. -- Evil Wylie]

September 2, 2010 at 8:06 AM | Unregistered CommenterRam

FS, that's funny. I'm not a Scribd employee, just a writer, photographer, widow, wife, mommy of four, who began uploading documents there four months ago, in hopes of gaining more interest in my forthcoming memoir, Drop Dead Life: A Pregnant Widow's Heartfelt and Often Comic Journey through Death, Birth, and Rebirth.

For me, Sribd has been an awesome way of building my platform and an unbelievably supportive writing community. Before I started uploading documents on Scribd--ones which could be pirated from my website--I had several agents interested in my book, all of whom said I needed to grow my readership. That's what Scribd has done for me. 45,000 reads in four months.

No, I do not agree with the way in which this archiving situation was handled, but I hope Scribd can sort it out, so that other unknown authors will see the value in the site's tremendous ability to connect readers to their work.

September 2, 2010 at 2:07 PM | Unregistered CommenterHyla Molander

Hyla, no real agent will take you on if you have content on Scribds. Facebook os the only "platform" they respect.

SCIBD is a criminal enterprise IMHO

September 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM | Unregistered Commenterryan

Ryan, I'm a huge fan of Facebook, although they've obviously had issues in the past, like many online communities. Ironically, because of an interview I had with Jane Friedman on the Writer's Digest Blog, which chronicles my experience on Scribd, I've been contacted directly by editors from two of the biggest publishing houses, both with interest in my memoir. Never would I have been contacted directly by those editors if I hadn't accumulated readers on Scribd. So, you can imagine why I hope Scribd can make ammends and move forward.

September 2, 2010 at 4:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterHyla Molander

FS, the notion that it is possible to steal an integer is absurd and laughable.

September 2, 2010 at 7:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterHigher

@ FS -- While I would obviously love to believe that Scribd is run by criminals, it is, like any other corporation or enterprise, run by humans. And humans make mistakes (yes, sometimes criminal mistakes, I suppose). Since the archive program was a "beta" test, according to Scribd, it's difficult to determine whether this was really part of their longterm strategy or whether the "right" people there weren't paying attention to the way the archive system was implemented.

September 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM | Registered CommenterAndrew Shaffer

@ Hyla -- Thanks for sharing your experience.

September 3, 2010 at 11:41 AM | Registered CommenterAndrew Shaffer

@Evil - my pleasure to share. Thank you for stimulating conversation.

September 4, 2010 at 2:20 AM | Unregistered CommenterHyla Molander
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.